Worms & Germs Blog

More dog travel issues

Posted in Dogs, Rabies, Vaccination

Importation issues, Part 1

FB Post - AzerbaijanA Facebook post was forwarded to me the other day. It reads “Drove to the airport today to pick up this lovely little girl [puppy] who flew all the way to Montreal from Baku Azerbaijan. Spent the afternoon with her romping around in Westmount Park. She will be up for adoption at ____ Animal Society and is seriously cute.”

There are a few issues here. Among them is taking a stressed (probably exhausted) puppy to a busy park after a very long trip. The infectious disease concern is taking this puppy (hard to say what it’s vaccine or deworming status is) from the other side of the world and immediately exposing it to other animals. That poses risks to this pup and others at the park. It’s also likely an illegal importation. Dogs that are not being brought in by their owners are considered commercial imports. Regulations specifically state that dogs coming in as rescues are considered commercial. Commercial importation of dogs <8 months of age that do not come from a registered kennel is illegal. Otherwise, they must have a rabies certificate, veterinary certificate of health, microchip or tattoo and an import permit. I doubt this dog had those.

Canine flu

Canine H3N2 influenza continues to spread across the US (likely after it came into the country with a dog imported from Asia). Click here for a map of CIV in the US and testing summary from Cornell University Animal Health Diagnostic Center.  The spread of the virus has been facilitated by inter-US travel; people taking their dogs on vacation to areas where the virus is active and bringing it home with them. I’m not saying dogs shouldn’t move within a county. It would just be wise for people traveling with their pets to do a little research into issues in areas they will be visiting. That might indicate a need for vaccination or anti-parasitic treatment for something not native to their home region, or identify a concern like H3N2 flu. If at all possible, people should not travel with their dogs to areas where H3N2 is active. If they do, they should make sure their dogs stay away from local dogs and, when they return home, that their dogs stay away from other dogs for a week or two in case they were infected.

Rabies in France (Importation issues, Part deux)

A few days ago, 13 adults and 3 kids in France started rabies post-exposure treatment after contact with a rabid puppy. As is the common story with rabies cases in that region, the dog was imported illegally. The dog came from Hungary in December, then accompanied its owners to Algeria in April. It began to show signs of rabies May 16, and the virus strain that was isolated was the Africa 1 strain, consistent with infection acquired in Algeria.

There were a couple breaches of the law in this case. Its initial importation from Hungary was illegal because it was not of the minimum age for importation, had not been vaccinated and had no identification. (Sadly, those wouldn’t be illegal in Canada. For importation of a personal pet, we don’t have a minimum age, and puppies less than 3 months of age don’t need to be vaccinated against rabies. There’s also no tracking. Dumb but true.) Its return from Algeria was also illegal. So, these owners who flaunted the law twice (and presumably didn’t ever get the dog vaccinated against rabies), combined with absent regulatory scrutiny led to the death of this dog and (expensive) treatment of at least 16 people.

Equine infectious disease research: Call for Ontario participants

Posted in Horses, Miscellaneous

Are you an Ontario horse owner? University of Guelph researchers now recruiting for new equine project!

Horses travel frequently, and the nature and extent of these travel patterns can contribute to the introduction and spread of diseases. The University of Guelph is conducting a study to determine how these movement patterns can influence new disease prevention strategies. We are currently recruiting participants to complete short monthly surveys (requiring less than 10 minutes of your time) about where and how frequently you travel with your horse. By joining our study, you would be contributing to the first study in Ontario to determine how disease prevention can be linked to movement patterns of horses. There is also a draw for prizes for participants!

To join the study or learn more, please visit: http://www.mathepilab.org/equinestudy2015/ Advertisement2COLOUR copy 2

Horses, strangles, streptococcus

Posted in Horses

Horse whiskers-1A paper in the journal BMC Research Notes describes a case of meningitis in a 73-year-old man that was attributed to contact with a horse (Madzar et al 2015). The man was admitted to hospital with fever, headache, neck stiffness, malaise and drowsiness. He was ultimately diagnosed with meningitis caused by Streptococcus zooepidemicus (technically, Streptococcus equi subsp zooepidemicus). He recovered, but ended up with significant loss of vision in one eye.

As is frustratingly common, there was no apparent investigation of the source of infection. It’s good that physicians asked about animal contact, but it would be nice to see some more effort to confirm the source (e.g. try to isolate the same bug from the horse and show it was the same strain). The report says the man was working with a horse with strangles, which is a little strange since that disease is caused by S. equi subsp equi, not S. zooepidemicus. Some potential explanations include:

  • The hospital lab misidentified S. equi as S. zooepidemicus.
  • The horse had a S. zooepidemicus that looked like strangles and the diagnosis wasn’t confirmed.
  • The two infections were unrelated.

Strep zoo infections are rare in people, despite the bacterium being very common in horses, and also found occasionally in some other species like dogs. The rarity of the problem is highlighted by the fact that a single case report made it into the literature. If it wasn’t an oddball case, it wouldn’t have been written up.

I often hesitate to write about rare things like this. It can cause an overreaction if people don’t put it into context. This is one of many bacteria that can cause infection given the right circumstances, but  those “right circumstances” are rare. Every animal and person is carrying many microbes that could cause disease in another person or animal, but it usually doesn’t happen. For me, cases like this highlight the importance of good routine infection control and hygiene practices, as well as the need for physicians to collect animal contact information from patients.

 

US Turtle Laws

Posted in Reptiles

Turtle close upTurtles are notorious Salmonella vectors. Because of that, various jurisdictions have rules limiting their sale, particularly the sale of small turtles (i.e. those that young kids are more likely to handle and try to put in their mouths). A recent publication from the CDC’s Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support is a Menu of State Turtle-Associated Salmonellosis Laws. It gives a good rundown of the different approaches used in different areas of the US.

Some are fairly strict, some more lax, and some are non-existent.

It’s interesting that some places ask for certification that turtles are Salmonella free. I’m not aware of any way to truly be confident in confirming that, and it’s a pretty weak approach. Striving for Salmonella-free makes sense. Killing Salmonella positive turtles isn’t logical, and selling “Salmonella free” turtles can lead to a false sense of safety.

Speaking of information, the Worms & Germs turtle infosheet can be found on the Worms & Germs Resources – Pets page.

The key aspects that help to control turtle-associated salmonellosis are fairly common on the menu, including keeping these high-risk animals away from high-risk people. Some states have requirements for warnings to be posted and for purchasers to review information. Those are the types of basic, easy and cheap measures that (if followed…now that’s another story) can likely have a very beneficial impact.

Small flocks, urban chickens and bird flu

Posted in Birds

Three poultry flocks in Ontario have been found to be infected with H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).  Under the direction of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), the lead agency when it comes to responding to federally reportable diseases like this, disease control zones have been established around the affected flocks, and movement of domestic birds and poultry products in and out of these zones is being carefully controlled in order to try to prevent further spread. Waterfowl flyways mapNo one knows for sure how the virus made it into these flocks.  Based on the fact that an almost identical flu virus was found in British Columbia and along the west coast late last year, and that the virus has recently been popping up with disturbing frequency in the central US, it is suspected that the virus is moving around in wild birds.  Migratory waterfowl in particular are prime candidates, as they travel long distances along certain routes such as the Mississipi flyway (which includes southwestern Ontario), and they generally don’t get sick from the virus, even though it’s highly fatal in domestic poultry. Commercial poultry flocks tend to have a lot of biosecurity and infection control procedures to prevent wild birds (or feces of wild birds) from coming in contact with the domestic birds, but sometimes some of the virus slips by one way or another, and it doesn’t take much to infect the flock when the virus is so pathogenic.  But the domestic birds that are most likely to have exposure to wild birds are small backyard flocks and birds like “urban chickens”.  There are also some wild bird species like raptors and wild turkeys that are susceptible to the virus (and it just so happens that turkey hunting season starts on Monday here in Ontario). It’s important to note that the risk to people posed by this particular virus is very low.  No human cases of H5N2 have been reported, despite the numerous outbreaks in poultry flocks across the continent. It is also not considered a food safety risk, but of course raw poultry and poultry products still need to be handled and cooked properly for lots of other reasons (like Salmonella).  There is some potential risk to those who have a lot of direct contact with infected birds though, so its important for backyard chicken enthusiasts and people like hunters to be aware of the potential risk.  These groups can also help with surveillance and monitoring by helping to identify affected birds in different areas so they can be tested for HPAI, thus helping to track the movement of the virus. The Ontario Animal Health Network (OAHN) has put together an infographic to help small flock owners and bird enthusiasts remember what to do to help detect and stop the spread of bird flu. OAHN has also put together a podcast and resources for both veterinarians and producers. Click here for the small flock advisory from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Avian Influenza Infographic -FINAL(1)    

Do headline writers actually read the articles?

Posted in Dogs

Newspaper2Part I Lyme disease is accompanied by enough paranoia. Bad headlines don’t help. A recent article on The Daily Mail is about Lyme disease and pets. It’s actually not a bad article, outlining some important issues. However, the headline shows a big disconnect between some good content in the article and a complete misunderstanding of the situation. The title: Warning to dog owners over the ticks that can wreck lives: Many are unaware their pets can transmit potentially deadly Lyme disease to them, say vets  To be brief, pets can’t transmit Lyme disease. Ticks that infect pets can also infect people, but that’s it. Part II Dr. Jason Stull (newly minted Canadian) spearheaded a commentary in the Canadian Medical Association Journal with Dr. Jason Brophy (infectious diseases physician) and myself. The article raises the issues of zoonotic diseases and pets, particularly in high risk people, and the need for physicians to have increased awareness thereof. It outlines some of the important issues, how pets and pet contact are common, what things increase the risk, the need for more information about pet-associated disease, and the need for people to take reasonable precautions to reduce the risks.

The title of the paper is important to consider: “Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections

The paper’s attracted a lot of attention. Some good. Some not. Many reporters have spun it towards sensationalizing the risks. Here are some examples of (bad) headlines:

  • Experts warn pets can cause illnesses, especially in immunocompromised owners
  • Your furry friend may be carrying diseases
  • Pets can make their owners sick, researchers say
  • Who let the dogs out? Pet therapy’s hidden danger

…and my favourite:

  • 8 disgusting diseases you can catch from your pet

I guess those headlines are catchy, but the key point is not that your cat or dog is likely to kill you. The key points are:

  • Physicians need to query pet contact when individuals become ill.
  • People need to think about basic routine practices to reduce the risk of disease transmission from pets, especially in high risk households.
  • We need more information about pet-associated diseases.

More accurate, but perhaps less catchy, headlines might have included:

  • Wash your hands, don’t eat poop and don’t be stupid, researchers say
  • Docs need to ask if patients have contact with animals

Probiotics…above all, do no harm?

Posted in Horses

Foal recumbentProbiotics are popular treatments for any number of ailments (in animals and people), but marketing, especially on the veterinary side, massively outstrips research. A few years ago, I worked on probiotic development in horses. We found what looked like a good candidate bug, but instead of just trying to sell it, we did a proper trial. Despite the positive properties it showed in the lab, it actually caused diarrhea in foals compared to a placebo group. Oops. (Does that make me a bioterrorist or just a really bad probiotic developer?) Anyway, history repeated itself with another probiotic trial in foals that was just published (Schoster et al, J Vet Internal Med 2015). Despite some promising results in the lab, foals treated with this bacterial combination were more likely to develop diarrhea that required veterinary care compared to untreated foals. I don’t mean to say that all probiotics are bad. However, the “well, you have nothing to lose” approach that is often taken with probiotics (and other nutraceuticals) may not be appropriate. Probiotics, and other nutraceuticals, should be properly scrutinized like any other kind of treatment or therapy.  

BC fake service dog crackdown

Posted in Dogs

It’s great to see some places taking service dog fraud seriously. I’ve ranted about this before because I’m a strong believer in the need for service dogs to have full access, and the need to make sure that’s not screwed up by selfish people who don’t actually have a service dog. Too many people are claiming their pets are service dogs to be allowed to take them places where they are banned, and too many unethical companies sell paraphernalia that people use to “identify” their dogs as a “service dogs”. When things go wrong, or when people get fed up and start to assume that any dog not accompanying a blind person is a fake, the true service dogs get compromised. As reported in the National PostThey may continue to overrun grocery stores and airplane cabins in the rest of the continent, but a new provincial law is declaring fake service animals will no longer be welcome in British Columbia.” British Columbia’s proposed Guide Dog & Service Dog Act would result in true service dogs being given government-issued identification. It’s great to see – and it’s about time.  Other jurisdictions should be following this closely.  

Dogs and norovirus

Posted in Dogs

Puppy on leashAnyone who’s had norovirus gastroenteritis knows that it’s pretty nasty. It spreads easily from person-to-person, and from (gross, yes, but true) vomit- and diarrhea-contaminated surfaces. The last thing we need is another source of infection to worry about. The potential for dogs to be sources of norovirus has gotten a lot of attention (often misguided) over the past few days, because of a recent research paper from the UK (Caddy et al, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2015). The key components of the study and its results were:

  • Stool samples were collected from dogs with and without diarrhea. The virus wasn’t found in any of 248 samples
  • Blood samples were collected and tested for antibodies against norovirus: 33% were positive, suggesting the dogs had been exposed to norovirus in the past and mounted an immune response. That doesn’t mean they were sick or able to infect others, just that they were exposed and their bodies reacted to the virus, as they should. This has been reported before.
  • Saliva samples were collected from a small group of dogs to test the virus’s ability to attach to canine saliva.  Norovirus was able to attach to saliva from all dogs.
  • Intestinal tissues from some research dogs were collected and tested for the ability of norovirus to attach. The virus could attach to all the intestinal samples.

Surprisingly, they didn’t test dogs owned by people with norovirus infection. I would have thought that would be the highest yield way to determine if dogs can be infected and shed the virus. It’s harder to do a study like that, since you have to have a way to identify infected households and get samples quickly, but it would be the most informative approach. You could test 248 people in the general population and not find norovirus, but that doesn’t mean people aren’t susceptible or able to shed the virus. Testing dogs that have been exposed to people with norovirus to see if they are able to shed the virus, and therefore be a potential source of infection, is an important next step to determine whether there is any potential issue here. So, should we be concerned?

Probably not. This study showed that dogs can be exposed (no surprise there) and that their bodies can respond to the virus. Mounting an immune response doesn’t mean that the virus was able to grow in the body and be shed. It’s interesting information but far from evidence that dogs are a concern. The authors rightly conclude “In summary, whereas HuNoV infection of dogs has been shown to be theoretically 
possible, the risk of this causing significant clinical disease in dogs is believed to be 
very low. 
” There are a lot of things that dogs get exposed to that they can’t then pass on. If dogs could infect us with everything to which they could produce and antibody response, we’d be in trouble. So, it’s an interesting piece of research that gives more support to the notion that we share a lot with our animals. However, I don’t think it indicates much to be worried about at this point.  

More on canine H3N2 flu

Posted in Dogs

Dog in car2Not surprisingly, I’ve been inundated with emails and calls about the H3N2 canine influenza outbreak that’s ongoing in the US. How far will it spread?

  • Who knows? It’s always hard to predict what will happen with influenza viruses. The spread of the H3N8 canine flu virus was surprisingly slow and sporadic, and it has yet to establish itself in Canada. This new H3N2 strain concerns me more because it might be more transmissible, and the Midwest US outbreak is unlike what we’ve seen in the past with H3N8. I suspect it will continue to spread, at least for a while.

How do we contain it?

  • Basic infection control measures.

Which are…?

  • If your dog is sick, keep it away from other dogs. Influenza viruses are only shed for a short period of time, so keeping sick dogs away from other dogs for 7-14 days will help.
  • If your dog has been exposed to dogs that might have been infected, keep it away from other dogs. It doesn’t matter if your dog is healthy. Peak flu shedding can occur very early in disease, and a lot of virus can be shed in the 24 hours before the dog starts to show signs of illness. So, keeping exposed animals away from others for 7-14 days after exposure is also a good idea, just in case.
  • Don’t travel to an endemic region with your dog.  If you are going on a trip to Chicago or other area where H3N2 is active and you don’t need to bring your dog along, then don’t risk exposing your dog, and/or possibly bringing the virus home with it.
  • Don’t travel out of an endemic region with your dog. Likewise, if you live in an area where H3N2 is active, don’t take your dog on a trip anywhere else. If it was infected before leaving, it could take the virus to a new region.
  • Don’t import dogs from shelters, puppy mills or similar facilities in areas where H3N2 is active.  Animals from these facilities are at higher risk for carrying many diseases, now including canine flu.
  • If the virus is active in your area, decrease dog-dog contact. Staying away from places where lots of dogs congregate (e.g. dog parks) can reduce the risk of exposure.
  • If you think your dog might have canine flu, don’t rush it to your vet. It might need to go to the vet, but that depends on severity of disease. Regardless, the best approach is to call first and mention the potential for influenza so that the vet clinic can take precautions (more on that coming soon in another post).

Does this virus pose a risk to people?

  • Probably not (or very limited), but flu viruses like to change. So, using basic infection control practices around infected dogs makes sense. It’s also important that situations in which people and dogs in the same household have respiratory disease be investigated to make sure that there hasn’t been interspecies flu virus transmission.