<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Scott Weese - Worms and Germs Blog</title>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/scott-weese.html</link>
<description>Scott Weese is an Associate Professor in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph, and Public Health and Zoonotic Disease microbiologist for the University&apos;s Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses. After graduating with a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degree and spending time in private practice, he completed an large animal internal medicine residency and Doctor of Veterinary Science graduate program. He is board certified in internal medicine by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine and is Chief of Infection Control at the Ontario Veterinary College Teaching Hospital. He has an active research program focusing on infectious diseases, particularly those that can be transmitted between animals and people. He lives outside of Guelph, Ontario with his family and a collection of pets, including a dog, cat, fish and a herd of rare-breed sheep. </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:36:10 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>..but pet fish are absolutely safe... aren&apos;t they???</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="175" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="121" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Fishbowl Cat.jpg" />Fish are very popular pets. It has been estimated that freshwater fish are owned by over 14 million people in the US, and saltwater fish are owned by approximately 800 000 people. Fish can be interesting, low maintenance pets, and the risks of disease transmission to people are low. However, low does not mean zero, and <strong>there are some diseases than can be spread from fish to people</strong>.</p>
<p>The most common (but still quite rare) disease that can be transmitted from fish to humans is infection with <em>Mycobacterium marinum</em>. This microorganism can be found in both freshwater and saltwater. It can cause skin infections, usually in areas where the skin is already broken, such as pre-existing scrapes and cuts, or skin that is damaged while cleaning an aquarium. Serious or long-term problems are rare in otherwise healthy people, but infection can be fatal in individuals with a weakened immune system.</p>
<p>Various other bacteria found on fish and in aquariums can cause infection in people as well. These are usually also &quot;opportunistic infections&quot; that tend to occur in people with weakened immune systems or infected wounds.</p>
<p>While fish are low risk pets, you can still minimize the risks that do exist by following a few simple precautions:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Wash your hands</strong> after contact with aquarium water or items in the aquarium. <strong>Gloves</strong> should be worn to prevent skin damage if you need to touch rough or sharp surfaces.</li>
    <li><strong>Do not clean an aquarium in the kitchen</strong>.</li>
    <li>Do not dump aquarium water down the kitchen sink.</li>
    <li>Prevent contact of aquarium water or contents with open wounds on your skin.</li>
    <li><strong>Keep aquariums covered</strong>. This helps keep other pets (e.g. cats) from drinking or playing in the water. (It also prevents escape attempts by the fish, which never end well!)</li>
</ul>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/other-animals/but-pet-fish-are-absolutely-safe-arent-they/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/other-animals/but-pet-fish-are-absolutely-safe-arent-they/</guid>
<category>Other animals</category><category>fish</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Stupid things done with bats</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm constantly amazed at what some people do with bats. Bats are a leading cause of human rabies exposure in North America.&nbsp; Despite extensive efforts to educate people about the importance of avoiding contact with bats, some people still either don't know or don't take these warnings seriously.</p>
<p><img hspace="2" height="138" width="170" vspace="2" align="left" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Bats2.jpg" alt="" />The latest bizarre example of stupid things done with bats occurred in Montana, where a parent <a href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081003/NEWS01/81003024">brought a dead bat to a school and let young children (kindergarten and grade 5 students) touch it</a>. Touching a bat in itself is a bad idea, let alone touching one that has died of unknown causes and encouraging kids to touch it. The teachers apparently had no objections to this activity. The parent who brought the bat had the students use an alcohol hand sanitizer after touching the creature, but it is still very irresponsible for someone to encourage children to touch a high-risk animal, regardless of what is done after. I'm sure the parents of the children didn't know beforehand, and certainly some were no doubt very upset when they found out about the incident (or livid would be a better description, if it was my kids that were involved). School officials did not find out about the dead bat until after its little visit, at which time the local and state public health authorities were contacted. <strong>The bat was tested and was positive for rabies.</strong></p>
<p>Overall, the risk of rabies transmission is probably low in this case, but not zero.&nbsp; It has therefore been recommended that the 80 students that may have touched the bat be given <strong>post-exposure rabies shots</strong>, which may cost up to <strong>$800</strong> per child!. Another ten children may have touched the bat at a soccer practice - for a dead bat, it sure covered a lot of ground!</p>
<ul>
    <li>Never touch a bat, dead or alive.&nbsp; Obviously, if you shouldn't touch a bat, you shouldn't encourage kids to do so either!</li>
    <li>Unstructured and unapproved contact with animals in classrooms should be prevented. Animals can be good educational tools, but only if student and animal health and welfare are properly addressed.</li>
</ul>
<p>More information on Rabies is available on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/other-animals/stupid-things-done-with-bats/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/other-animals/stupid-things-done-with-bats/</guid>
<category>Other animals</category><category>Rabies</category><category>bats</category><category>schools</category><category>what were they thinking?</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Your mother was right! Wash your hands</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="2" height="199" width="199" vspace="2" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Handwashing.jpg" />You may notice a recurring theme in many of our posts and on virtually all of the information sheets on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page: an emphasis on <strong>handwashing</strong>. There is increasing emphasis on hand hygiene (i.e. hand washing and use of alcohol hand sanitizers) education in hospitals because the hands of healthcare workers are a major (if not the most important) means of disease transmission between patients. Despite hand hygiene being easy, cheap and effective, people rarely wash their hands as often as they should, and they often don't do it properly.</p>
<p>Most of the research about hand hygiene that has been published has focused on its use and impact in human hospitals, but this area is now also being studied more with regard to animals and veterinary medicine. A study published earlier this year in <em>Veterinary Microbiology </em>provided more evidence that hand hygiene is a critical infection control measure when dealing with animals. The study, coordinated by Dr. Maureen Anderson (of Worms&amp;Germs fame) looked at MRSA carriage rate in veterinarians who work with horses. In addition to finding a high rate of MRSA carriage among these veterinarians (which was consistent with other reports indicating that equine vets are at higher than average risk for exposure to MRSA), the study looked at factors associated with MRSA carriage. <strong>Vets that reported routinely washing their hands between farms and those that reported washing their hands after contact with potentially infectious cases had a significantly lower rate of MRSA carriage</strong>. That should come as absolutely no surprise, but it's one more piece of evidence that we need to pay more attention to this routine infection control measure, in human hospitals, in veterinary environments and in households.</p>
<p><strong><em>Remember, the 10 most important sources of infection are the fingers on your hands!</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/pub/pubhealth/pdf/handwash_tech.pdf">Click here for instructions on how to wash your hands properly</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/cats/your-mother-was-right-wash-your-hands/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/cats/your-mother-was-right-wash-your-hands/</guid>
<category>Birds</category><category>Cats</category><category>Clostridium difficile</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Horses</category><category>MRSA</category><category>Other animals</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>Parasites</category><category>Pocket pets</category><category>Reptiles</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>Toxoplasmosis</category><category>hand hygiene</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>What puts dogs at risk for MRSA?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's clear that <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/articles/another_category/test_subcategory/">methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)&nbsp;</a>has emerged as a problem in dogs, both in terms of dog health and in terms of dogs as a potential sources of infection for people. <strong>It is thought that MRSA&nbsp;in pets is often (if not usually) acquired from people. </strong>Until recently, it has been unclear what makes individual dogs more likely to infected by MRSA compared to other bacteria. A study by Dr. Meredith Faires from the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca">University of Guelph</a> has provided some important new information in this regard. The study compared dogs with MRSA infections to dogs with infections caused by methicillin-susceptible strains of <em>S. aureus</em> (also called MSSA)<em>,</em> from three large veterinary hospitals. Here are some key findings from Dr. Faires study:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Animals that received fluoroquinolones </strong>were significantly more likely to develop an MRSA versus an MSSA infection.&nbsp; Fluoroquinolones are a specific class of antibiotics that includes drugs such as enrofloxacin, orbifloxacin and marbofloxacin.</li>
    <li><img height="149" alt="" hspace="2" width="215" align="right" vspace="2" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Staph Gram.jpg" />In both groups (MRSA and MSSA), <strong>most of the infections were skin and ear infections</strong>, with no significant difference in types of infection between the groups.</li>
    <li>There was <strong>no difference in the proportion of animals that survived their infections between the two groups</strong>: in both groups, over 90% of the animals survived. However, it is important to bear in mind that the majority of the infections were skin and ear infections, which are not usually life-threatening.&nbsp; Further study of more serious types of infection is needed to determine if MRSA&nbsp;is associated with a greater risk of death in dogs and cats.</li>
</ul>
<p>This study provided more evidence that MRSA&nbsp;is an important problem in dogs and cats, and that the use of antibiotics is likely an important factor in the development of MRSA infections, compared to infections caused by MSSA. It also showed that the survival rate for common types of MRSA infections is high, if the infection is properly diagnosed and managed.&nbsp; Hopefully the information provided by this study can be used in future studies to help evaluate more risk factors, and to identify things that can be done to reduce the impact of MRSA in dogs and cats.</p>
<p>More information about MRSA in pets can be found on the <strong>new MRSA information sheets </strong>posted on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page.</p>
<p><strong>Picture</strong>: Gram stain of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/dogs/what-puts-dogs-at-risk-for-mrsa/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/10/articles/animals/dogs/what-puts-dogs-at-risk-for-mrsa/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>MRSA</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>World Rabies Day</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="134" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Dog and family.jpg" />This Sunday, September 28th, is <a href="http://www.worldrabiesday.org/">World Rabies Day</a>. The goal of this day its to raise awareness about rabies, a disease that still kills thousands of people and animals in many parts of the world every year. While human rabies is thankfully rare in most developed countries, it is a major health concern in many other regions. Even in countries such as&nbsp;Canada and the US, where human cases are uncommon, diligent vigilance is required, because rabies continues to be present in wildlife, and therefore people and pets can still be exposed to this deadly disease.</p>
<p>A key part of rabies prevention, which is also a major focus of rabies education programs, is the need for vaccination of pets, <u>even strictly indoor pets</u>. Rabies vaccination is a cheap and effective way of protecting your pet, yourself and your family from this disease. It's also required by law in many areas.&nbsp; The implications of rabies exposure of pets that are not properly vaccinated can be severe, possibly including euthanasia or very long quarantine, even if they are not infected.</p>
<p>Many groups are holding events to increase awareness about rabies, such as the <a href="http://www.ovc.uoguelph.ca/events/#Sep-28">People and Pets Walk to End Rabies</a> which is being held by the <a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca">University of Guelph</a>. Information from an advertisement for this event states &quot;<strong>Although rabies does not seem like an issue at home, it is a major health problem for both humans and animals in developing countries, claiming the life of one person every ten minutes. &nbsp;If we work together, we can make a difference. Please show your support and join us at the walk to help make rabies history!&quot; </strong>That statement should make it clear why we talk about rabies so much. One human death every 10 minutes is a startling figure for a disease which we should be able to control.</p>
<p>More information about rabies is available on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/cats/world-rabies-day/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/cats/world-rabies-day/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Rabies</category><category>Vaccination</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Healthmap</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for an interesting website to play around with, you should try <a href="http://www.healthmap.org/en">HealthMap</a>. This is a website created by the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology that maps infectious disease reports from various sources. You can search by region and see what disease problems have been reported recently, or select specific diseases and find out where they've been reported.&nbsp;&nbsp; Some examples are shown below. The top image shows all disease reports worldwide (in the last 30 days), while the bottom image shows reports of <em>Salmonella</em> in North America during the same time period. The site relies on reports of diseases (many cases of various diseases occur but are never reported), so it focuses mainly on outbreaks or high profile cases , but it is still quite interesting.<img hspace="5" height="281" width="500" vspace="5" align="bottom" alt="" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/world.jpg" /></p>
<p>Above: All reported disease outbreaks/cases<em> </em>worldwide in the last 30 days.<br />
Below: Reported outbreaks/cases of <em>Salmonella </em>in North America in the last 30 days.<br />
See the <a href="http://www.healthmap.org/en">HealthMap</a> site for more details.</p>
<p><img hspace="5" vspace="5" align="bottom" style="width: 436px; height: 373px;" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/salm.jpg" alt="" /></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/another-category/healthmap/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/another-category/healthmap/</guid>
<category>Clostridium difficile</category><category>Diseases</category><category>MRSA</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>Parasites</category><category>Rabies</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>Toxoplasmosis</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Salmonella outbreak linked to turtles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reminder of the risks associated with handling turtles (and other reptiles) comes to us from a report published earlier this year regarding an outbreak of <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5703a3.htm">salmonellosis in people tied to contact with turtles</a>.&nbsp; In this case, more than 100 people in 33 US states were affected. The report sparked additional <a href="http://www.knbc.com/health/17539138/detail.html">public education efforts in Los Angeles county, CA</a>, where eight of the cases occurred.</p>
<p><img width="200" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="133" align="left" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/Turtle.jpg" alt="" />The report comes as no surprise - turtles are actually relatively commonly implicated in cases of salmonellosis in people (although still not nearly as commonly as foodborne transmission). It's particularly a concern in children, because kids may have close contact with pet turtles and may be more susceptible to serious infection.</p>
<p>In response to the cases in Los Angeles, the county Department of Public Health emphasized that parents must be wary of buying turtles for their children. Even though the sale of small turtles (less than 4 inches long) was banned in the US over 30 years ago, unfortunately these animals are still widely available in many pet stores, flea markets, and from other sources. Los Angeles Public Health personnel reported that <strong>children were getting sick because they were kissing their pet turtles</strong> - something that is very risky and should <strong><em>never</em></strong> be done by anyone, especially children. If people have pet turtles, they must be very diligent to practice good hygiene to reduce the risk of transmission of <em>Salmonella</em>.</p>
<p>More information about the risks associated with pet turtles, and measures that should be taken by people who own turtles, is available on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page. <br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/reptiles/salmonella-outbreak-linked-to-turtles/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/reptiles/salmonella-outbreak-linked-to-turtles/</guid>
<category>Reptiles</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>turtles</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Treatment of MRSA and MRSP: more than meets the eye</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus </em>(MRSA) and methicillin-resistant <em>S. pseudintermedius</em> (MRSP) are important causes of infection in pets, and are resistant to many different antibiotics. It's therefore very important that these bacteria are cultured and tested in a lab to determine what antibiotics <strong>may </strong>be effective.&nbsp; Even then, choosing an effective medication can be difficult due to the limited number of potentially effective drugs.</p>
<p><img hspace="5" height="162" width="250" vspace="5" align="right" src="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/uploads/image/dtest.jpg" alt="" />Treatment selection is further complicated by problems that can occur when methicillin-resistant staphylococci are tested against certain drugs in the lab - problems that are not readily apparent unless extra testing is done.&nbsp; One &quot;problem&quot; drug is the antibiotic clindamycin. Clindamycin can be an effective treatment for MRSA or MRSP infections, but some MRSA strains may be resistant to it <em>despite appearing to be susceptible based on normal laboratory testing</em>. This is because the bacteria can have &quot;inducible resistance&quot;.&nbsp; Inducible resistance can be detected by a special test called a D-test (see picture), but this test is not widely performed in veterinary laboratories.</p>
<p>In recent study presented by Dr. Meredith Faires (University of Guelph) at a conference last week, <strong>55% of MRSA from dogs and cats that were reported to be resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin were actually inducibly resistant to clindamycin</strong>.&nbsp; But no MRSA that were susceptible to erythromycin were inducibly resistant to clindamycin. In contrast, <strong>inducible resistance to clindamycin was not identified in any MRSP</strong>. Therefore, in the absence of specific testing for inducible resistance (i.e. a D-test), <em><strong>it is wise to consider all erythromycin resistant MRSA to be clindamycin resistant as well, regardless of the results of traditional antibiotic susceptibilty testing</strong></em>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/cats/treatment-of-mrsa-and-mrsp-more-than-meets-the-eye/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/cats/treatment-of-mrsa-and-mrsp-more-than-meets-the-eye/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>MRSA</category><category>antibiotics</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Pet food and Salmonella</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/pet-food-recall-salmonella/">recent pet food recall for <em>Salmonella</em></a> has generated a lot of attention and, encouragingly, more resources containing information about reducing the risk of <em>Salmonella</em> from handling pet foods. One is a video from <a href="http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/">Drs. Doug Powell</a> and Randy Phebus of <a href="http://www.k-state.edu/">Kansas State University</a>, that can be seen by clicking on the image below. Another is an <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/foodbornetips.htm">information sheet produced by the FDA</a>. Many of the recommendations, as well as those we've made in <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/tags/diet/">previous posts</a>, are basic and common sense, but are often overlooked because handling pet food is not perceived as a risk for infectious disease. While the overall risks of infection from handling commercial pet food are low, these easy, common sense measures should still be used. <img alt="" src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ9ehAJsZO0" /></p>
<object height="344" width="425">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZ9ehAJsZO0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><embed height="344" width="425" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZ9ehAJsZO0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></embed></object>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/pet-food-and-salmonella/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/pet-food-and-salmonella/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>diet</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Pet food recall: Salmonella</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="2" height="237" width="200" vspace="2" align="left" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Dog Food w Dog.jpg" />Mars Petcare has <a href="http://www.petcare.mars.com/">recalled certain pet foods</a> produced in a plant in Everson, Pennsylvania and sold in several US states. This is being done because two lots of pet food were found to be contaminated with <em>Salmonella</em> Schwarzengrund. This is the same <em>Salmonella</em> strain that was identified during a <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5719a4.htm">pet-food associated outbreak of salmonellosis in people in 2006-2007</a>. Production of pet food at this facility was stopped in July because of a potential link between pet food produced there and infections in two people.&nbsp; More <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/MarsPetCareQnA.htm">information about this recall is available from the FDA</a>.</p>
<p>While commercial pet foods undergo rigourous quality control and are much less likely to contain potentially harmful bacteria such as <em>Salmonella</em> than, for example, raw meat diets, it is important to remember that situations such as this can happen. So it's still a good idea to <strong>wash your hands after handling pet food</strong>, of any kind.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/pet-food-recall-salmonella/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/pet-food-recall-salmonella/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>diet</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Raw meat feeding revisted, part II: So you want to feed raw meat to your pet...</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="207" vspace="5" hspace="5" height="226" align="right" src="/uploads/image/raw.jpg" style="" alt="" />In a recent post, I&nbsp;discussed a study about the health effects of feeding raw meat diets to pets. <strong>Because of the significantly higher rates of shedding of certain potentially harmful bacteria by dogs that are fed raw meat, I&nbsp;think raw meat diets are a bad choice - especially in households with young children, elderly individuals or people with compromised immune systems. </strong>However, if you are going to feed raw meat to your pet, you should take some basic precautions.</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Only use meat that is suitable for human consumption</strong><strong>.</strong> Don't buy 'adulterated' meat or meat labeled unfit for human consumption.</li>
    <li><strong>Keep raw meat frozen until you need it.</strong> Only thaw out the portion that is need for the next feeding, and thaw the meat in a sealed container on the bottom shelf of a refrigerator.</li>
    <li><strong>Handle raw meat with care.</strong> Do not allow it to contaminate kitchen surfaces or items that may come in contact with other food. Clean and disinfect any items that come into contact with raw meat.</li>
    <li><strong>Wash your hands thoroughly</strong> after handing raw meat or anything that has touched raw meat (e.g. your dog's food bowl).</li>
    <li>If your pet does not finish all the meat fed right away, <strong>discard any uneaten raw meat promptly.</strong> Do not allow raw meat to sit in a bowl at room temperature.&nbsp;Some dangerous bacteria can multiply rapidly under these conditions.</li>
    <li>Regularly <strong>clean and disinfect your pet's food bowl</strong>, but bear in mind that&nbsp; <a href="/uploads/file/Can Vet J 2006 Weese.pdf">a recent study showed that it is very hard to eliminate <em>Salmonella</em> from raw meat in food bowls</a>.</li>
    <li>Make sure your veterinarian knows that you feed raw meat. This is particularly important if your dog develops vomiting or diarrhea.</li>
    <li>It is very important to make sure that your pet's diet is well balanced, which can sometimes be difficult to do when feeding non-commercial or raw diets.&nbsp; Read about raw meat feeding, and try to find good sources of information (which is not always easy) to reduce the risk of problems caused by feeding an unbalanced diet.</li>
    <li><strong>Never feed raw meat to sick dogs, puppies or pregnant dogs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/raw-meat-feeding-revisted-part-ii-so-you-want-to-feed-raw-meat-to-your-pet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/raw-meat-feeding-revisted-part-ii-so-you-want-to-feed-raw-meat-to-your-pet/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>diet</category><category>raw meat</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Raw meat feeding revisited: what are the risks and benefits of raw diets for dogs?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="5" height="170" width="170" vspace="5" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Meat Question.jpg" />Feeding raw meat diets to dogs is a very controversial issue. Some proponents passionately advocate these diets (e.g. the <a href="http://www.barfworld.com/">BARF diet</a>)&nbsp;based on vague and unproven recommendations. Opponents cite various studies showing that pets fed raw meat (not surprisingly) have high carriage rates of potentially harmful bacteria such as <em>Salmonella</em>,<em> </em>and reports of diarrhea or nutritional imbalances in these animals. However, there have been only a few good studies looking at the true health benefits and risks of feeding these diets to dogs.</p>
<p>A recent study in the journal <a href="http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1863-1959&amp;site=1"><em>Zoonoses and Public Health</em></a> described the risks of therapy dogs shedding <em>Salmonella</em> and other potentially harmful bacteria. The authors tested 200 dogs over a 1 year period, 20% of which were fed raw meat as part of their normal diet. <strong>Dogs fed raw meat were 23 times more likely to shed <em>Salmonella</em> compared to other dogs</strong>. They were also 17 times as likely to be shedding extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) <em>Escherichia coli</em> (a highly drug-resistant form of <em>E. coli</em>).&nbsp;</p>
<p>The study concluded that, because of the risk of <em>Salmonella</em> shedding and the high-risk nature of the patients and other people that therapy dogs interact with, <em>dogs that are involved with hospital/patient visitation programs should not be fed raw meat</em>.</p>
<p><strong>What does this tell us about feeding raw meat to pets? </strong></p>
<p>Although this study doesn't answer all of the questions about the risks of raw meat diets, it reinforces the fact that pets fed raw meat have significantly higher rates of shedding of potentially harmful bacterial such as <em>Salmonella</em> and antibiotic-resistant <em>E. coli</em>. Eating pig ear treats has also been associated with <em>Salmonella</em> shedding. However, there was no association between a dog being fed raw meat and the animal itself developing diarrhea. In fact, raw-fed dogs had a lower incidence of extra-intestinal infections (combination of eye, ear, skin and urinary tract infections).</p>
<p><strong>In general, raw meat diets should be avoided.</strong> While adverse health effects were not reported in this study, disease (including deaths) from <em>Salmonella</em> has been reported in dogs in other studies. While the overall risk may be low, <em>feeding raw meat is an avoidable risk</em>. However, it would be inappropriate to completely ignore the finding that raw-fed dogs had lower rates of certain infections. It is possible that there can be health benefits from feeding raw meat in certain dogs, but <strong>the potential benefits must be weighed against the potential risks to the animals and people with which the has contact. </strong>Raw meat diets should never be fed to pets that have contact with immunocompromised people (in the household or as part of visitation program), infants or the elderly.</p>
<p>If you are going to feed raw meat to your pet, make sure you take precautions to reduce the risk of infecting yourself or someone else. We'll post more on that aspect soon.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/raw-meat-feeding-revisited-what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of-raw-diets-for-dogs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/raw-meat-feeding-revisited-what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of-raw-diets-for-dogs/</guid>
<category>Dogs</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>diet</category><category>e. coli</category><category>hospital visitation</category><category>raw meat</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Dogs in restaurants</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="2" height="170" width="170" vspace="2" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Dining Dog.jpg" />I just passed through Paris en route to a conference in Belgium, and was reminded of a topic that comes up occasionally: pets in restaurants. While &quot;dining with dogs&quot; is a common site in many areas of Europe, it is rare in North America. I periodically get asked about the risks associated with having pets (usually dogs) in restaurants, and unfortunately there isn't a clear answer.</p>
<p>Overall, the infectious disease risks associated with having &quot;Rover&quot; in a restaurant should be very low. Dogs don&rsquo;t emit some intangible &quot;aura of infection,&quot; so just having them in the vicinity while people are eating is not a problem.&nbsp; Microorganisms have to make it from the dog&rsquo;s body to a person (and usually into their mouth) to cause disease. We don&rsquo;t have many concerns about airborne spread of diseases from dogs to people.&nbsp; In reality, <strong>simply having a dog in a restaurant <em>should </em>be less risk than having people in the restaurant</strong> (since people <em>can</em> transmit some infections to each other over short distances by coughing and sneezing).&nbsp; But for this to be true, people still have to handle their dogs properly, meaning people who touch a dog should wash their hands before eating, and restaurant staff should not touch any dogs in the restaurant at all.</p>
<p>Does this mean we should be allowing dogs in all restaurants? Not necessarily. <strong>The biggest weakness of even the most logical infection control measures is lack of compliance</strong> - people who break the &quot;rules&quot;. For example, would people <em>actually </em>minimize contact with the dog and wash their hands? Would food servers <em>really </em>stay away from them? Would all dogs be adequately trained never to bite, scratch, jump up or behave inappropriately in a busy restaurant environment? Furthermore, people with allergies to pets and fear of dogs need to be considered.</p>
<p>In the end, <strong>most </strong>dogs probably would not cause a problem in <strong>most </strong>restaurants around <strong>most</strong> people&hellip; but &quot;most&quot; is <strong><em>not</em> </strong>&quot;all&quot;. Clearly, this is not a straightforward issue, and there are logical arguments on both sides.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/dogs-in-restaurants/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/09/articles/animals/dogs/dogs-in-restaurants/</guid>
<category>Dogs</category><category>restaurants</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Transmission of tuberculosis to pets</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="124" vspace="5" hspace="5" height="124" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/mask.jpg" />Some people consider tuberculosis to be a disease of historical interest, but TB&nbsp;is alive and well, and spreading. TB is caused by <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/tb/"><em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em></a>, a microorganism that can cause severe lung disease. TB rates are climbing rapidly in some countries and the emergence of <a href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2006/np23/en/index.html">highly drug resistant strains</a> is a major concern. Anytime infectious diseases become more common in people in the general population, there is the potential for exposure of household pets.&nbsp; Recently, <a href="http://www.thetimes.co.za/PrintEdition/News/Article.aspx?id=828700">transmission of TB from humans to different animal species, including a dog, was reported</a>. This follows earlier sporadic reports of TB&nbsp;in dogs. Finding TB in pets, albeit a small number, raises concerns about the potential role of pets in transmission of TB back to people.</p>
<p>Diagnosis of TB in pets is not particularly surprising, since it has been clearly shown by a few other infectious diseases that disease trends in people can sometime be reflected in their pets. It's hard to say if this is an under-recognized problem, an emerging problem or a very rare event that gets a lot of publicity. Really, the only way to tell will be to see what happens over time. Currently, TB&nbsp;is very rare in pets so it is important to keep possible risks and concerns in perspective. There is no reason for pet owners with TB to give up their pets. People with active TB should consider their pets as part of the family, and interact with them as they have been instructed to with people (i.e. if they are supposed to avoid close contact with people they should do the same with their pets).</p>
<p>There is currently no indication that infected pets can transmit TB back to people, and the risks are probably very low. TB is most easily spread through coughing, and pets with TB rarely develop respiratory disease with coughing. That, combined with the rarity of TB&nbsp;in pets, means that the risk of acquiring TB is much, much higher from other people than from pets. &nbsp;</p>
<p>This is just one more example of the &quot;one medicine&quot; concept, whereby we need to break down the barriers between 'animal diseases' and 'human diseases' (because the bugs are clearly doing so).</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/transmission-of-tuberculosis-to-pets/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/transmission-of-tuberculosis-to-pets/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>tuberculosis</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Banning Bowser from the beach</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="154" align="left" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Beach dog family.jpg" />Many dog owners love to take their canine companions to the beach with them during the summer.  Unfortunately, other people (particularly non-dog owners) sometimes take exception to having Bowser on the beach.  These individuals often cite potential infectious disease risks as a reason to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/cornwall/4913644.stm">ban dogs from the beach</a>.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>While there are some potential infectious disease risks associated with having pet dogs at the beach, they are minimal.</strong></em>  Also, some simple, common-sense steps can greatly reduce the risks that do exist.  The infectious disease risks from feral (wild) dogs and wildlife defecating in the sand are much greater.</p>
<ul>
    <li>The biggest health risk is actually probably from dog bites. Bites can be avoided through proper handling and training of dogs that are brought to public beaches.</li>
    <li>Many different bacteria (e.g. <em>Salmonella</em>, <em>Campylobacter</em>) can be passed in the stool of even healthy dogs. Some of these can be harmful to people, but only under certain circumstances, such as if they are swallowed or if they contaminate an open wound.
    <ul>
        <li>Promptly picking up any stool passed by a dog greatly reduces the risk of significant contamination of the sand. Also, sunlight is an excellent &ldquo;disinfectant&rdquo; and will help kill any residual bacteria left behind.</li>
    </ul>
    </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Dogs can also have different kinds of zoonotic parasites in their stool.
    <ul>
        <li>Some of these parasites (e.g. roundworms, hookworms) are passed in a form that takes days to become infectious to people.  So promptly removing dog stool from the beach minimizes the risk of transmission.</li>
        <li>Other parasites, such as <em>Giardia</em>, are immediately infectious when passed in the stool, but must be swallowed to cause infection.  Prompt removal of dog stool, good hand hygiene with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer before eating, and avoiding sand contamination of food and drink should largely eliminate this risk as well.</li>
    </ul>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>Overall, <strong>the risks of having dogs on beaches are very low if people behave responsibly</strong>, specifically <u>properly restraining</u> their dogs and <u>promptly picking up stool</u>.<br />
<br />
More information about zoonotic diseases associated with contamination of sand and <strong>Sandboxes</strong> is available on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/dogs/banning-bowser-from-the-beach/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/dogs/banning-bowser-from-the-beach/</guid>
<category>Dogs</category><category>Parasites</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>beaches</category><category>bites</category><category>campylobacter</category><category>giardia</category><category>sandboxes</category><category>wildlife</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Listeriosis outbreak in Canada: are pets at risk?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="150" vspace="5" hspace="5" height="150" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Pastrami.png" /><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/08/24/health-listeria.html">An ongoing outbreak of listeriosis in people in Canada</a> has been linked to prepared meat products from Ontario. <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hSUmmUmpm2K0PRUN1pIRtxEF8DqA">At least six deaths</a> have been reported, and others are under investigation. While it is unlikely that there has been widespread exposure of dogs and cats, it is certainly possible that some pets were fed the recalled (and potentially contaminated) meat.</p>
<p>Listeriosis is an infection caused by the bacterium, <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nczved/dfbmd/disease_listing/listeriosis_gi.html"><em>Listeria monocytogenes</em></a>. It can affect many animal species, but it is rarely identified as a cause of disease in dogs and cats. When signs do occur, fever, diarrhea and vomiting are most commonly reported.&nbsp; Rare cases of neurological disease in dogs and cats, and one case of suspected miscarriage in a dog due to listeriosis have been reported. <em>Listeria</em> skin infection has also been reported in dogs.</p>
<p>Overall, the risk of listeriosis in pets associated with the tainted meat products is very low. <strong>Pets that ate any of the recalled food products do NOT need to be tested or treated if they are not ill.</strong> However, should a pet that ate recalled meat become ill, it is important to inform the animal's veterinarian about the potential exposure to <em>Listeria</em>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/listeriosis-outbreak-in-canada-are-pets-at-risk/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/listeriosis-outbreak-in-canada-are-pets-at-risk/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>Salmonella</category><category>listeriosis</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Eastern equine encephalitis in Ontario</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thescugogstandard.ca/news/2008/August-08/Aug22-08/Equine_Encephalitis-387.html">A horse in Ontario was recently diagnosed with Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE)</a>, a serious neurological disease caused by a virus of the same name, which is transmitted by mosquitoes.&nbsp; The horse was from the <a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=Lake+Scugog,+Ontario&amp;sll=44.183558,-80.820923&amp;sspn=0.058103,0.081196&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=44.347422,-78.843384&amp;spn=1.854126,2.598267&amp;z=8">North Durham</a> region.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/horses/facts/info_equv.htm">The last reported cases of EEE in Ontario were in 2004</a>.&nbsp; A few weeks ago, the Worms &amp; Germs Blog talked about a <a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/orlandosentinel/access/1516039821.html?dids=1516039821:1516039821&amp;FMT=ABS&amp;FMTS=ABS:FT&amp;type=current&amp;date=Jul+22%2C+2008&amp;author=Robyn+Shelton&amp;pub=Orlando+Sentinel&amp;edition=&amp;startpage=B.1&amp;desc=Fatal+horse+infection+making+comeback%3A+%27It%27s+horrible+to+see%27">large number of cases of EEE that have been reported in Florida this year</a>.</p>
<p><img width="185" vspace="2" hspace="5" height="275" align="right" src="/uploads/image/Horse w girl.jpg" alt="" />Here are some of the key points to remember about EEE:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Like West Nile, EEE is a seasonal disease.&nbsp; It is more common in warmer areas, especially some regions of the southeastern US.&nbsp; It is rare in cooler climates, but occasionally EEE is found in horses in Ontario.</li>
    <li>EEE&nbsp;is usually fatal in horses, and there is no effective treatment.</li>
    <li>EEE can also occur in people, and can be fatal in some cases.</li>
    <li>Infected horses cannot transmit the EEE virus to people, but if a horse gets EEE from the mosquitoes in the area, then people could also potentially be exposed to the virus by mosquitoes.</li>
    <li>A vaccine for EEE is available for horses, but most horses in Ontario are not vaccinated for EEE because it is so rare.&nbsp; Nonetheless, vaccination can be considered because the disease is so devastating when it occurs.</li>
    <li>As for West Nile virus, <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/another-category/other-diseases/protecting-your-horse-and-yourself-from-west-nile-virus/">avoiding mosquitoes - for both horses and people</a> - is an important preventative measure for EEE.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information, see the Worms &amp; Germs Blog post <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/other-animals/eastern-equine-encephalitis-not-just-for-horses/">&quot;Eastern Equine Encephalitis &ndash; Not Just For Horses&quot;</a>, or the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/Arbor/eeefact.htm">CDC's website on arboviral encephalitides</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/horses-1/eastern-equine-encephalitis-in-ontario/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/horses-1/eastern-equine-encephalitis-in-ontario/</guid>
<category>Horses</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>Vaccination</category><category>eastern equine encephalitis</category><category>mosquitoes</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Are pregnancy and cats compatible?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="175" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="117" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Cat Lounge(2).jpg" />There is a degree of risk of disease transmission from any contact with an animal, just as there is from any contact with another person.&nbsp; Some of the diseases involved are minor or even insignificant, while others are potentially devastating.&nbsp; And the risk can change in certain situations, such as pregnancy. A developing fetus is more susceptible to some diseases that may typically have little to no effect on an adult.&nbsp; Toxoplasmosis is one disease that gets a lot of attention from pregnant women.</p>
<p>Toxoplasmosis is caused by the protozoal parasite <em>Toxoplasma</em> <em>gondii</em>.&nbsp; Infection of a pregnant woman with <em>Toxoplasma</em> can cause birth defects or even miscarriage. But the real risk occurs when a woman who has not been previously exposed to <em>Toxoplasma</em> becomes infected during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were exposed to <em>Toxoplamsa</em> before they became pregnant, and therefore already have antibodies against the parasite, are not at risk.</p>
<p>Cats are the only animal species that can spread <em>Toxoplasma</em> in their stool. Only a very small percentage of cats are shedding <em>Toxoplasma</em> at any one time, but the proportion can be higher among cats that go outside, hunt or are fed raw meat. It takes 24 hours or more for <em>Toxoplasma</em> in cat stool to become infectious - a person cannot be infected with <em>Toxoplasma</em> from fresh stool. This key point can greatly reduce the risk of transmission from a cat, if the cat's litter box is cleaned out on a daily basis.</p>
<p>Any infection that can potentially have devastating effects on a fetus needs to be taken seriously. While it appears to be rare these days, some women are still advised to get rid of their cats if they are pregnant. <u><strong>Pregnant women do not need to give up their cats!&nbsp;</strong></u><strong> </strong>A few basic measures can greatly reduce the risk of transmission of <em>Toxoplasma </em>from cats to pregnant women:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Pregnant women should not have contact with litter boxes (or any cat feces) if possible - preferably another person should do the litter box cleaning.
    <ul>
        <li>If a pregnant woman must clean the litter box, it should be done daily so that <em>Toxoplasma</em> does not have enough time to become infectious.</li>
    </ul>
    </li>
    <li>Litter boxes should be regularly scrubbed and cleaned with scalding water (see the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Worms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page for more information on <strong>Litter Boxes</strong>).</li>
    <li>Keep your cat's fur free of stool contamination.&nbsp; This is especially&nbsp; important in longhaired cats that might get stool on the fur around their hind end, or sick/old/obese cats that have difficulty grooming themselves properly.</li>
    <li>Keep your cat indoors. Outdoor cats are more likely to be exposed to <em>Toxoplasma</em> and spread the infection.</li>
    <li>Do not feed your cat raw meat.</li>
    <li>Wash your hands thoroughly after cleaning the litter box, handling raw fruit and vegetables, and working with soil (for example, in the garden).</li>
    <li>Cook all meat completely to recommended temperatures, and practice safe meat handling to prevent spread of contamination from raw meat to kitchen surfaces and other food.</li>
</ul>
<p>More information about <strong><em>Toxoplasma</em></strong> and zoonotic diesases associated with<strong> Cats</strong> can be found on the <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/"> Woms &amp; Germs Resources</a> page.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/are-pregnancy-and-cats-compatible/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/are-pregnancy-and-cats-compatible/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Toxoplasmosis</category><category>pregnancy</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Antibody titres versus vaccination: the rabies debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Rabies is an important disease that is almost always fatal. An important part of rabies control programs is mandatory vaccination of pets such as dogs, cats and ferrets. In general, rabies vaccination is very safe and effective. Complications from rabies vaccination are rare, but in recent years concerns have been raised about <a href="http://www.avma.org/vafstf/vafstf01.asp">vaccine-associated sarcoma</a>, a type of tumour that can develop at the site of vaccination. Since this complication was recognized, the vaccines themselves and the way they are administered have been changed in order to decreased the likelihood of this problem occuring, but the risk cannot be eliminated completely. For this reason, some people have tried to avoid having their pets vaccinated for rabies.&nbsp;</p>
<p>A<img width="179" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="161" align="right" alt="" src="/uploads/image/Blood tubes(1).jpg" /> blood test can be performed to determine antibody levels (also called a titre) against rabies virus. <strong>However, there is not enough information available to determine what antibody titre is high enough to say that an animal does not need to be re-vaccinated</strong>. <u><em>Skipping rabies vaccination based on blood test results is dangerous and not recommended</em></u>. While rabies is uncommon in most areas, exposure can occur, even in strictly indoor animals (e.g. if a <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/04/articles/animals/cats/why-should-i-vaccinate-fluffy-hes-an-indoor-cat-aka-why-im-glad-i-vaccinated-finnegan-my-indoor-cat/">bat gets into the house</a>). Rabies vaccination is a legal requirement in most areas of Ontario. The implications of rabies exposure in an animal that is not &quot;up-to-date&quot; on its vaccines can be severe, including prolonged quarantine or euthanasia. I do not know of any jurisdictions that allow rabies antibody levels to be used in place of vaccination, and animals that are not recently vaccinated are treated as non-vaccinated, regardless of their antibody titre.&nbsp; <strong>The risk to your family or your pet from rabies is greater than the very tiny risk of vaccine-associated sarcoma</strong>. <strong>If you care about your pet and your family, make sure your pet is properly</strong><strong> vaccinated against rabies. </strong></p>
<p>More information about rabies can be found on the Worms &amp; Germs <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/promo/services/">Resources</a> page.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/antibody-titres-versus-vaccination-the-rabies-debate/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/cats/antibody-titres-versus-vaccination-the-rabies-debate/</guid>
<category>Cats</category><category>Dogs</category><category>Rabies</category><category>Vaccination</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Protecting your horse and yourself from West Nile virus</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In Ontario, and many other regions, mid-August is the beginning of the high risk period for West Nile virus infection in people and animals such as horses. The <a href="http://www.ovc.uoguelph.ca/">Ontario Veterinary College</a> has published an informational video on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/">YouTube</a>. This video has information about measures you can take to reduce the risk of West Nile virus exposure and disease, for both people and horses. Click on the image to watch the video.&nbsp; More information about West Nile virus is also available in the blog post entitled <a href="http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/05/articles/animals/dogs/west-nile-virus-in-dogs-and-cats/">West Nile virus in dogs and cats</a>.</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xptV1WxKbus&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><embed width="425" height="344" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xptV1WxKbus&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></embed></object>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/horses-1/protecting-your-horse-and-yourself-from-west-nile-virus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/2008/08/articles/animals/horses-1/protecting-your-horse-and-yourself-from-west-nile-virus/</guid>
<category>Horses</category><category>Other diseases</category><category>Vaccination</category><category>mosquitoes</category><category>west nile virus</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<author>jsweese@uoguelph.ca (Scott Weese)</author>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>